Foster Care

Professor Pastrana English 1-20 September 28, 2009 C atomic number 18, love, nurturing, and nonhing more As we turn and learn, the only people we truly trust are our family. Our family is so-called to teach, love, and nurture us; they should provide us with safety device and care. When a father carries all these attributes, why should anyone second-guess his potential in his childrens lives? Richard Wexlers article Panic in Foster headache, says, Gerardo R. was a loving father who always cared for his children, but when his divorce wife lost delay of the children, Gerardo R. did non win appreciation both because of insufficient housing conditions.(A27) I do not condition with the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family services decision in Gerardo Rs aspect that income should plant whether the parent is fit to raise his children. Society has been evolving and changing for centuries, but who would afford thought children would be taken from th eir throw up parents for no ethical reason? Gerardo R. was denied not only hold but also the right to read his children. He was a normal American who worked hard but apparently it was not sufficient enough to gain custody of his children.

What truly determines whether a father is capable for providing his children with basic necessities? In my opinion, if the father has a home, job, and can provide his children with love, then what more is needed? Gerardo should have got received legal custody of his children or at least(prenominal) the opportunity to communicate with them. He did not abuse or expend his child ren, so why did they deny his right to see o! r talk to his children? Although this article does not go into across-the-board detail, the transparent points Jreisat 2 tell the lecturer that the only reason he was denied his... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay